Nokia 2600 classic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 2630
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia C1-01
Nokia 2600 classic
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 2320 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 2610
Nokia 2600 classic
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 2680 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches vs 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 1600
Nokia 2600 classic
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Nokia 1600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 classic vs. Nokia 2600
Nokia 2600 classic
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Nokia 2600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
