Nokia 2600 classic Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 2600 classic the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 2600 classic compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia 2630
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 2630-specific Pros & Cons
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.33 inches)
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 8GB-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia 5730 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5730 XpressMusic-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2600 classic vs Micromax X263
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Micromax X263-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia C1-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C1-01-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2600 classic vs Samsung E2121B
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.11 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung E2121B-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (119 ppi)
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia X2-05
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia X2-05-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 2600 classic vs Nokia 1661
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2600 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 1661-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
