x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 2600 classic Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia C1-01 Nokia C1-01


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)

Nokia 6070 Nokia 6070


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia Asha 302 Nokia Asha 302


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories