x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 2600 classic Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia C1-01 Nokia C1-01


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia 206 Dual SIM Nokia 206 Dual SIM


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2680 slide Nokia 2680 slide


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia 6720 classic Nokia 6720 classic


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches vs 4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 6270 Nokia 6270


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.91 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories