x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 2220 slide US Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia 515 Nokia 515


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches vs 4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia Asha 310 Nokia Asha 310


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung SGH-E250 Samsung SGH-E250


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches vs 3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola i95cl Motorola i95cl


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.26 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto X Motorola Moto X


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (316 ppi)
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2220 slide US Nokia 2220 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S III Samsung Galaxy S III


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (306 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories