x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 1680 classic Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 1680 classic Nokia 1680 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 100 Nokia 100


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 1680 classic Nokia 1680 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung SGH-T199 Samsung SGH-T199


  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (102 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 1680 classic Nokia 1680 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 2610 Nokia 2610


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 1680 classic Nokia 1680 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola C168 Motorola C168


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2680 slide Nokia 2680 slide


  • Small dimensions (3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 1680 classic Nokia 1680 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 1661 US Nokia 1661 US


  • Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches)
  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories