Motorola XOOM Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola XOOM vs. Motorola XOOM 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Google Nexus 10
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1700 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Motorola DROID XYBOARD 10.1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Google Nexus 7
Motorola XOOM
- Dual core processor
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Motorola XOOM vs. Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
- Quad core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
