Motorola WX290 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola WX290 vs. Motorola WX290 US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Nokia Lumia 620
Motorola WX290
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Nokia Lumia 610
Motorola WX290
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 610
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Motorola VE440
Motorola WX290
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Nokia C1-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Nokia Lumia 800
Motorola WX290
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 800
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola WX290 vs. Samsung C3011
Samsung C3011
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.24 x 1.78 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.35 x 1.80 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
