Motorola W510 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola W510 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola W510 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola W510 vs Motorola W490
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W510-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
Motorola W490-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola W510 vs Motorola RAZR2 V8
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W510-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola RAZR2 V8-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.08 x 0.46 inches)
- Slow processor (500 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola W510 vs Motorola MOTO U9
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W510-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
Motorola MOTO U9-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.91 x 0.64 inches)
Motorola W510 vs Motorola WX295
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi vs 116 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W510-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola WX295-specific Pros & Cons
none
