Motorola W388 Rivals and Competitors

Rivals

Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola W388 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola W388 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola W388 vs T-Mobile Sidekick Slide

Motorola W388 VS. T-Mobile Sidekick Slide
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola W388-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)

T-Mobile Sidekick Slide-specific Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Bulky
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)

Motorola W388 vs Palm Centro

Motorola W388 VS. Palm Centro
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola W388-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)

Palm Centro-specific Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (312 MHz)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Bulky
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Motorola W388 vs Samsung C3050

Motorola W388 VS. Samsung C3050
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola W388-specific Pros & Cons

none

Samsung C3050-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Motorola W388 vs LG VX9400

Motorola W388 VS. LG VX9400
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola W388-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

LG VX9400-specific Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use