Motorola W385 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola W385 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola W385 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola W385 vs Motorola i412
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola i412-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Motorola W385 vs Samsung Haven
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.72 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Haven-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
Motorola W385 vs Samsung Gusto
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Gusto-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.99 x 1.86 x 0.56 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
Motorola W385 vs Motorola Crush
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Crush-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola W385 vs Samsung Messager Touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Messager Touch-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola W385 vs Motorola Clutch + i475
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 220 x 176 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Motorola Clutch + i475-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
Motorola W385 vs Verizon Wireless CDM8975
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Verizon Wireless CDM8975-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
Motorola W385 vs Motorola Quantico
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 1.00 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W385-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola Quantico-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
