Motorola W270 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola W270 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola W270 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola W270 vs Motorola W376g
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
Motorola W376g-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola W270 vs Motorola W220
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola W270 vs Motorola SLVR L7e
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches vs 4.47 x 1.93 x 0.45 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola SLVR L7e-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola W270 vs Motorola W230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
Motorola W230-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
Motorola W270 vs Motorola W260g
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
Motorola W260g-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola W270 vs Nokia C1-02
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.54 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C1-02-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
Motorola W270 vs Motorola MOTO W755
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
