Motorola W220 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola W220 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola W220 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola W220 vs LG 600g
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
none
LG 600g-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (116 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola W220 vs Motorola W270
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola W270-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches)
Motorola W220 vs Samsung SGH-T245G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
Samsung SGH-T245G-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola W220 vs Philips Xenium X100
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Philips Xenium X100-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 1.72 x 0.59 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Motorola W220 vs Sony Ericsson T237
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 101 x 80 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola W220-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson T237-specific Pros & Cons
none
