Motorola Tundra VA76r Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola Tundra VA76r the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola Tundra VA76r compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Samsung Rugby II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Samsung Xcover 271
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Samsung Rugby
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.90 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Samsung SGH-A657
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.77 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Pantech Breeze III
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs AT&T Z331
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs Nokia 6350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Tundra VA76r vs AT&T Z221
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches vs 0.73 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment



