Motorola ROKR EM330 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola ROKR EM330 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola ROKR EM330 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola ROKR EM330 vs Motorola ROKR EM325
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
Motorola ROKR EM330 vs Motorola ROKR EM35
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola ROKR EM35-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola ROKR EM330 vs AT&T Z331
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
AT&T Z331-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola ROKR EM330 vs Nokia N76
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Nokia N76-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola ROKR EM330 vs Motorola GLEAM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola GLEAM-specific Pros & Cons
none
