Motorola ROKR EM325 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola ROKR EM325 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola ROKR EM325 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Motorola ROKR EM330
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
Motorola ROKR EM330-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Samsung SGH-T404G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Samsung SGH-T404G-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Motorola MOTOROKR EM25
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola MOTOROKR EM25-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Motorola ROKR EM35
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Motorola ROKR EM35-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 152 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (512 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs LG GW300
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
LG GW300-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Motorola ROKR EM30
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches vs 4.53 x 2.09 x 0.42 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
Motorola ROKR EM30-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola ROKR EM325 vs Motorola ROKR E8
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches vs 4.52 x 2.08 x 0.41 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ROKR EM325-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
Motorola ROKR E8-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
