Motorola ROKR E6 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola ROKR E8
Sony Ericsson W8 Walkman
Motorola ROKR EM325
Motorola MILESTONE
HTC Explorer
Samsung Galaxy Y
Samsung Galaxy S III Verizon

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Motorola ROKR E8

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola ROKR E8

Small dimensions (4.52 x 2.08 x 0.41 inches inches)

Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Sony Ericsson W8 Walkman

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Sony Ericsson W8 Walkman

none

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Motorola ROKR EM325

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola ROKR EM325

Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches inches)

Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Motorola MILESTONE

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola MILESTONE

High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)

Slow processor (600 MHz)
Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. HTC Explorer

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

HTC Explorer

Slow processor (600 MHz)

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy Y

Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 133 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Motorola ROKR E6 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III Verizon

Motorola ROKR E6

Lacks Wi-Fi
Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Low-resolution video capture
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S III Verizon

Dual core processor
Very big display (4.8 inches)
Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
Fast mobile data support (4G)
NFC
HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison

Samsung Galaxy S4
- Announced: 14 Mar 2013
- OS: Android 4.2.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1900 MHz, Krait 300, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.0 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
Apple iPhone 5
- Announced: 12 Sep 2012
- OS: iOS
- Hardware: Dual core, 1300 MHz, Apple Swift, 1016 MB RAM
- Display: 4.0 inches, 640 x 1136 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900), CDMA (800 1700/2100 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS EV-DO Rev.A EV-DO Rev.B
Samsung GALAXY Note II
- Announced: 29 Aug 2012
- OS: Android 4.1.2 4.1.1
- Hardware: Quad core, 1600 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 35 hours of Talk Time, 980 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 21.1 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
HTC One
- Announced: 19 Feb 2013
- OS: Android 4.1.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1700 MHz, Krait 300, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 4 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900), CDMA (800 1900)
- Data: LTE HSPA (unspecified) UMTS EDGE GPRS
Sony Xperia Z
- Announced: 07 Jan 2013
- OS: Android 4.1.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.0 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13.1 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 11 hours of Talk Time, 550 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
Google Nexus 4
- Announced: 29 Oct 2012
- OS: Android 4.2.2 4.2.1 4.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 15.3 hours of Talk Time, 390 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
LG Optimus G
- Announced: 28 Aug 2012
- OS: Android 4.1.2 4.0.4
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 15 hours of Talk Time, 335 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE HSPA (unspecified) UMTS EDGE GPRS
Nokia Lumia 920
- Announced: 05 Sep 2012
- OS: Windows Phone 8
- Hardware: Dual core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 1024 MB RAM
- Display: 4.5 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8.7 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 17 hours of Talk Time, 400 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS

Carriers

Manufacturers

Phone tools

Carriers

Manufacturers

Tablet tools

Phone Links

Motorola ROKR E6 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Popular stories

Hot Phones

Interesting stories

Make your Samsung Galaxy S4 sound better with Adapt Sound

Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA

All from Google I/O 2013

Nokia Lumia 925 - thinnest WP8 smartphone to date

The forbidden fruit: 7 great apps Google does not allow on Play store

Google I/O 2013 is coming, but what will it bring?

10 great personalization apps for Android

Verizon's Nokia Lumia 928 vs AT&T's Nokia Lumia 920