x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola ROKR E6 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Motorola ROKR E8 Motorola ROKR E8


  • Small dimensions (4.52 x 2.08 x 0.41 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Thick body (0.70 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Motorola DROID RAZR Motorola DROID RAZR


  • Small dimensions (5.15 x 2.71 x 0.28 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (1 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 256 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks GPS

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 192 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Motorola RAZR V3 Motorola RAZR V3


  • Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia 108 Nokia 108


  • Small dimensions (4.35 x 1.85 x 0.53 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 114 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E6 Motorola ROKR E6


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Motorola ROKR EM325 Motorola ROKR EM325


  • Small dimensions (3.98 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories