x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola ROKR E2 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.80 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Low pixel density screen (256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Nokia 6030 Nokia 6030


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E (2015) Motorola Moto E (2015)


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Low pixel density screen (245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto X (2014) Motorola Moto X (2014)


  • Big display (5.2 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (423 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (73.46 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola ROKR E2 Motorola ROKR E2


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories