x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola QUENCH Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Galaxy Pocket Plus Samsung Galaxy Pocket Plus


  • Dual SIM card support
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH Motorola QUENCH


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH Motorola QUENCH


  • No front-facing camera

Motorola DEFY PRO Motorola DEFY PRO


  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 214 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Pocket 2 Samsung Galaxy Pocket 2


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 121 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH Motorola QUENCH


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 3


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (386 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.78 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH Motorola QUENCH


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

LG G4 LG G4


  • Big display (5.5 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (538 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH Motorola QUENCH


  • Single-core processor

Huawei Ascend Y330 Huawei Ascend Y330


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Buy This Phone

Latest stories