x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Motorola QUENCH XT3 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • The camera lacks autofocus

HTC Legend HTC Legend


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (384 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia E5 Nokia E5


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

OPPO R7 Lite OPPO R7 Lite


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Dual SIM card support
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.25 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris N320 LAVA Iris N320


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 125 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 5c Apple iPhone 5c


  • High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories