x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola QUENCH XT3 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

HTC Legend HTC Legend


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (384 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia E5 Nokia E5


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S7 edge Samsung Galaxy S7 edge


  • Big display (5.5 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (534 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (76.09 %)
  • Lots of RAM (4096 MB RAM)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola QUENCH XT3 Motorola QUENCH XT3


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 5c Apple iPhone 5c


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Latest stories