x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Motorola Q GSM Motorola Q GSM


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9m Motorola Q9m


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

BlackBerry Q10 BlackBerry Q10


  • High pixel densitiy screen (330 ppi)
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)

Nokia E55 Nokia E55


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

BlackBerry Pearl 8100 BlackBerry Pearl 8100


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 32 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 260 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories