Motorola Q CDMA Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Motorola MOTO Q 11
Motorola MOTO Q 11
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Palm Treo 755p
Palm Treo 755p
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Motorola Q9m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. HTC Ozone
HTC Ozone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Samsung BlackJack II
Samsung BlackJack II
- Dual core processor
- Small dimensions (4.40 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola Q CDMA vs. Samsung Omnia II CDMA
Motorola Q CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Omnia II CDMA
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 208 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
