x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola Q CDMA Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q9m Motorola Q9m


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola KRZR K1m Motorola KRZR K1m


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus

BlackBerry Tour 9630 BlackBerry Tour 9630


  • Low pixel density screen (250 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 360 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G LTE (2015) Motorola Moto G LTE (2015)


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Dual SIM card support
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Lumia 1520 Nokia Lumia 1520


  • Big display (6.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (368 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola DROID PRO Motorola DROID PRO


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories