Motorola MPx220 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola MPx220 vs. Motorola RAZR V3xx
Motorola MPx220
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola MPx220 vs. Motorola MPx200
Motorola MPx220
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches vs 1.06 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Motorola MPx220 vs. Sony Ericsson S700 / S710a
Motorola MPx220
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches vs 0.96 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola MPx220 vs. Motorola A630
Motorola MPx220
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches vs 0.91 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola MPx220 vs. Motorola ROKR E1 (E790)
Motorola MPx220
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches vs 0.80 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola MPx220 vs. Nokia 6101 / 6102
Motorola MPx220
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6101 / 6102
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.10 inches inches vs 0.94 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
