x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Wildfire HTC Wildfire


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 125 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.375 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Wildfire S HTC Wildfire S


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Wildfire S T-Mobile HTC Wildfire S T-Mobile


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Samsung Galaxy Note 4


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (515 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.39 %)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (3 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy A8 Samsung Galaxy A8


  • Lightweight phone
  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (73.91 %)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Small dimensions (6.22 x 3.02 x 0.23 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.23 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Wildfire CDMA HTC Wildfire CDMA


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 125 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSURF A3100 Motorola MOTOSURF A3100


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Wildfire S CDMA HTC Wildfire S CDMA


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories