x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Motorola MOTOSMART Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (329 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Y


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 768 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Pocket Samsung Galaxy Pocket


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy S6


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.27 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto X (2014) Motorola Moto X (2014)


  • Big display (5.2 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (423 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (73.46 %)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories