x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola MOTOSMART Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson W715 Sony Ericsson W715


  • Small dimensions (3.74 x 1.89 x 0.56 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Hazel Sony Ericsson Hazel


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 154 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson W508 Sony Ericsson W508


  • Small dimensions (3.68 x 1.97 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola MOTOLUXE Motorola MOTOLUXE


  • Small dimensions (4.63 x 2.38 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Pocket Samsung Galaxy Pocket


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM vs 1 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Rugby 4 Samsung Rugby 4


  • Water-resistant phone
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories