x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola MOTOSMART Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Y


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Galaxy Ace


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung GALAXY S Advance Samsung GALAXY S Advance


  • Dual core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Sony Xperia E Sony Xperia E


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOSMART Motorola MOTOSMART


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 710 Nokia Lumia 710


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories