x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola MOTOKEY MINI Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia Asha 210 Nokia Asha 210


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOKEY MINI Motorola MOTOKEY MINI


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Samsung Galaxy Young Samsung Galaxy Young


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (768 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 176 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOKEY MINI Motorola MOTOKEY MINI


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Samsung Galaxy Core 2


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (768 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 207 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX119 Motorola EX119


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Small dimensions (4.06 x 2.36 x 0.39 inches)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX115 Motorola EX115


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 174 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOKEY MINI Motorola MOTOKEY MINI


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Core Prime Samsung Galaxy Core Prime


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 207 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTOKEY MINI Motorola MOTOKEY MINI


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 144 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E6 Nokia E6


  • High pixel density screen (325 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories