Motorola MOTOACTV W450 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola MOTOACTV W450 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola MOTOACTV W450 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs HTC EVO Design 4G
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneMotorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC EVO Design 4G-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (275 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Motorola KRZR K1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
Motorola KRZR K1-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 1.65 x 0.62 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Motorola PEBL U6 (V6)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola PEBL U6 (V6)-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Samsung Rugby II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Rugby II-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Motorola RAZR2 V8
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
Motorola RAZR2 V8-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.08 x 0.46 inches)
- Slow processor (500 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Motorola WX295
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola WX295-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (116 ppi)
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Samsung Rugby
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.90 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Rugby-specific Pros & Cons
- Splash-proof phone
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 vs Motorola Quantico
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 1.00 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTOACTV W450-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola Quantico-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
