Motorola MOTO W755 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola MOTO W755 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola MOTO W755 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola MOTO W755 vs Motorola Adventure V750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755 vs Samsung Sway
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Motorola MOTO W755 vs Motorola Entice W766
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755 vs LG Chocolate 3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola MOTO W755 vs LG Revere
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.72 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755 vs Motorola KRZR K1m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755 vs LG Cosmos 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola MOTO W755 vs Motorola W385
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment



