x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola MOTO Q 11 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 186 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

ZTE Source ZTE Source


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 218 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 5 Apple iPhone 5


  • High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories