Motorola MOTO Q 11 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola MOTO Q 11 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola MOTO Q 11 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Motorola Q9m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Samsung SGH-i200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 174 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Motorola Q9h
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Motorola XT316
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola MOTO Q 11-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Nokia C3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Samsung SCH-i760
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-i760-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Palm Pixi Plus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola MOTO Q 11-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola MOTO Q 11 vs Nokia E5
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola MOTO Q 11-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment



