x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola MOTO Q 11 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Q9m Motorola Q9m


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola DROID 4 Motorola DROID 4


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
  • Splash-proof phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Motorola Q CDMA Motorola Q CDMA


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung ATIV S Neo Samsung ATIV S Neo


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High pixel density screen (308 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

HTC One mini 2 HTC One mini 2


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Huawei Ascend P7 Huawei Ascend P7


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (445 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.50 x 2.71 x 0.26 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.26 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola MOTO Q 11 Motorola MOTO Q 11


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Motorola Q GSM Motorola Q GSM


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories