x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola Karma QA1 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Karma QA1 Motorola Karma QA1


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

LG Remarq LG Remarq


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Karma QA1 Motorola Karma QA1


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola FLIPOUT US Motorola FLIPOUT US


  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)

in-depth comparison



Motorola Karma QA1 Motorola Karma QA1


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input

in-depth comparison



Motorola Karma QA1 Motorola Karma QA1


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

LG G5 LG G5


  • Big display (5.3 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (554 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (4 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPOUT Motorola FLIPOUT


  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola RAMBLER Motorola RAMBLER


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Karma QA1 Motorola Karma QA1


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S7 edge Samsung Galaxy S7 edge


  • Large pixel size (1.4 μm)
  • Big display (5.5 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (534 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (76.09 %)
  • Lots of RAM (4 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories