Motorola Karma QA1 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola Karma QA1 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola Karma QA1 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Samsung Rugby II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
Samsung Rugby II-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Pantech Laser
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Pantech Laser-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.45 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Motorola FLIPOUT
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola FLIPOUT-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (720 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Motorola WX450
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
Motorola WX450-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Samsung Evergreen
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Evergreen-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Motorola RAZR V3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Motorola RAZR V3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Motorola MOTOROKR W6
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Motorola MOTOROKR W6-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Karma QA1 vs Samsung Flight II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola Karma QA1-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Flight II-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Shop Links
Check priceeXpansys US $219.99
Advertise here
