Motorola KRZR K3 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola KRZR K3 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola KRZR K3 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Nokia 6131
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
Nokia 6131-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Sony Ericsson Yendo a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Yendo a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (156 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Motorola KRZR K1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches vs 4.05 x 1.65 x 0.62 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
Motorola KRZR K1-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Nokia 5610 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 5610 XpressMusic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Nokia 7210 Supernova
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches vs 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.42 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
Nokia 7210 Supernova-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Sony Ericsson Yendo
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Yendo-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (156 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Motorola GLEAM+
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GLEAM+-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Motorola KRZR K3 vs Motorola GLEAM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola KRZR K3-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GLEAM-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
