Motorola GRASP Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola GRASP vs. Nokia 7705 Twist
Motorola GRASP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Nokia 7705 Twist
- Small dimensions (2.71 x 2.71 x 0.59 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Apple iPhone 5
Motorola GRASP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Verizon Wireless Razzle
Motorola GRASP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Pantech Jest 2
Pantech Jest 2
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Apple iPhone 4S
Motorola GRASP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Samsung Brightside
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 129 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Motorola GRASP vs. Samsung GALAXY Note II
Motorola GRASP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung GALAXY Note II
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.5 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Supports special active stylus for input
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

