x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola GLEAM+ Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung C3520 Samsung C3520


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola GLEAM+ Motorola GLEAM+


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung GT-S3600 Samsung GT-S3600


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola GLEAM+ Motorola GLEAM+


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung C3560 Samsung C3560


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung E2530 Samsung E2530


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 102 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Alcatel 2010 Alcatel 2010


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola GLEAM+ Motorola GLEAM+


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola RAZR2 V9 Motorola RAZR2 V9


  • Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.08 x 0.52 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories