Motorola GLEAM+ Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Samsung C3520
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Motorola GLEAM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Samsung C3560
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung C3560
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. LG A250
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Samsung GT-S3600
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung GT-S3600
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Alcatel OT-536
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM+ vs. Samsung E2530
Samsung E2530
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
