Motorola GLEAM Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola GLEAM vs. Motorola GLEAM+
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Samsung C3520
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Samsung C3560
Motorola GLEAM
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung C3560
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Samsung GT-S3600
Motorola GLEAM
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung GT-S3600
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Samsung E2530
Samsung E2530
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Nokia 2720 fold
Motorola GLEAM
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Nokia 2720 fold
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola GLEAM vs. Samsung M370
Samsung M370
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
