x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola FLIPSIDE Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Pantech Crossover Pantech Crossover


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola BACKFLIP Motorola BACKFLIP


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • Single-core processor

Sharp FX Plus Sharp FX Plus


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPOUT Motorola FLIPOUT


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

AT&T Impulse 4G AT&T Impulse 4G


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 246 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPSIDE Motorola FLIPSIDE


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Captivate Glide Samsung Captivate Glide


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out ()

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories