x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola Evoke QA4 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola DROID 4 Motorola DROID 4


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



LG Neon LG Neon


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC EVO 3D HTC EVO 3D


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Low pixel density screen (256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Samsung SCH-A870 Samsung SCH-A870


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)

Kyocera Rio E3100 Kyocera Rio E3100


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Merge HTC Merge


  • Low pixel density screen (246 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Huawei Ascend Huawei Ascend


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories