Motorola Evoke QA4 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS
Motorola Evoke QA4
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. Apple iPhone
Motorola Evoke QA4
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. BlackBerry 8703e
Motorola Evoke QA4
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
BlackBerry 8703e
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.80 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. BlackBerry 8830
Motorola Evoke QA4
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. Nokia 6265i
Motorola Evoke QA4
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Nokia 6265i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.87 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola Evoke QA4 vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Motorola Evoke QA4
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 8GB
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
