x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola Evoke QA4 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2 Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Samsung SCH-A870 Samsung SCH-A870


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Alcatel OneTouch Hero 2 Alcatel OneTouch Hero 2


  • Big display (6.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (367 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.83 %)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)

Kyocera Rio E3100 Kyocera Rio E3100


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Alcatel OneTouch POP Mega Alcatel OneTouch POP Mega


  • Big display (6.0 inches)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (184 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Merge HTC Merge


  • Low pixel density screen (246 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola Evoke QA4 Motorola Evoke QA4


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Huawei Ascend Huawei Ascend


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories