x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola EX124G Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S III Samsung Galaxy S III


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (306 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Galaxy Centura Samsung Galaxy Centura


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy S6


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.27 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)

LG 840G LG 840G


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto G (2014) Motorola Moto G (2014)


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Xperia E3 Sony Xperia E3


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 218 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Motorola EX124G Motorola EX124G


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories