Motorola ES400 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola ES400 vs. Kyocera DuraPlus
Motorola ES400
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Kyocera DuraPlus
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.93 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Motorola Admiral
Motorola ES400
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 258 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Samsung Rugby Smart
Motorola ES400
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 252 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Samsung Galaxy Rugby Pro
Motorola ES400
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy Rugby Pro
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Water-resistant phone
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Kyocera DuraXT
Motorola ES400
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Kyocera DuraXT
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 1.12 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Kyocera DuraMax
Motorola ES400
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Kyocera DuraMax
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 1.00 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Motorola ES400 vs. Verizon Wireless Casio G’zOne Ravine 2
Motorola ES400
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Verizon Wireless Casio G’zOne Ravine 2
- Built-in flashlight
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.83 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
