Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola MOTO W755
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola V620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.94 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola V620-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola Entice W766
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola Entice W766-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola V710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola V710-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Nokia N8
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneMotorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N8-specific Pros & Cons
- Global phone that can work on any GSM/UMTS network in the world
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Nokia N95 US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola VU204
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola VU204-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood vs Motorola Rapture VU30
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola E815 / E816 Hollywood-specific Pros & Cons
none
Motorola Rapture VU30-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
