x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola E680 / E680i Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola E680 / E680i Motorola E680 / E680i


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.83 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola DROID Motorola DROID


  • Low pixel density screen (265 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola E680 / E680i Motorola E680 / E680i


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.83 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

BlackBerry Passport BlackBerry Passport


  • High-resolution display (1440 x 1440 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (453 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola E680 / E680i Motorola E680 / E680i


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.83 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola Moto X (2014) Motorola Moto X (2014)


  • Big display (5.2 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (423 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (73.46 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola E680 / E680i Motorola E680 / E680i


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.83 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy S6


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.27 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola E680 / E680i Motorola E680 / E680i


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola M1000 Motorola M1000


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (132 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.83 inches inches vs 0.84 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 208 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Latest stories