x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • Single-core processor
  • No front-facing camera

BLU Dash 4.0 BLU Dash 4.0


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola i890 Motorola i890


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola RAZR i Motorola RAZR i


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 222 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



BLU Dash JR BLU Dash JR


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S4 Samsung Galaxy S4


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (441 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola CLIQ XT Motorola CLIQ XT


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 208 Nokia 208


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 166 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories