Motorola CITRUS User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Build quality4.2/10Text input2.5/10Everyday usage2.8/10UI speed1.5/10Camera3.5/10Multimedia4/10Internet2.7/10Call quality4.8/10Battery3.3/10Reception3.3/10Display3.2/10
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
posted on 22 Jan 2013, 21:14 (Posts: 13; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)
i made a stupid mistake...
v2497 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
i thought the phone would be good because it looked cool, i was just a kid, didnt have money and the phone was free so i went for it...the review were 1 and a half stars i made a huge mistake...i was probably better off with a refurbished droid X. so i had to go back to my old basic phone...i just upgrade to the droid razr m :) checked everything for the specs from hardware to software...Build quality 4/10Reception 2/10Call quality 8/10Internet 2/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 8/10UI speed 2/10Everyday usage 5/10Text input 2/10Display 2/10Battery 2/10
- fast in downloading apps
- camera quality
- it lags
posted on 30 Mar 2012, 10:14 (Posts: 80; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
Beholder88 has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
I used this phone for about 2 and a half months between my Droid X and my RAZR. There is no comparison between the Citrus and any other smartphone out there, other than maybe the LG Vortex. It was barely capable of the most basic functions like web browsing and even text messaging. I do give it points for being rather sturdy. I dropped it a few times and it held up like a champ. Not meant for anyone that wants a real smartphone, more of a novelty than anything.Build quality 5/10Reception 3/10Call quality 3/10Internet 2/10Multimedia 2/10Camera 3/10UI speed 1/10Everyday usage 2/10Text input 3/10Display 1/10Battery 2/10
- Decent build quality.
- Glitchy operation.
- Low screen resolution.
- Slow UI response.
posted on 12 Feb 2012, 12:07 (Posts: 0; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
Courtney has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
This is an overall bad phone to buy. The camera really suck. The phone is completely slow. It does not have flash for the camera. Web browsing speeds are really slow. If you are a fast typer, the phone will not keep up at all. The phone is a complete fail.Build quality 2/10Reception 2/10Call quality 1/10Internet 1/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 1/10UI speed 1/10Everyday usage 3/10Text input 1/10Display 2/10Battery 2/10
- Call quality
- UI speed
- Text input
posted on 27 Oct 2011, 17:39 (Posts: 0; Member since: 27 Oct 2011)
ALICIAMS has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
over all its built is good the touch screen is good the features suck.I like the colors and its easy to manage it the service it sucks half the time it shuts off n most of the time my text r not sent.I have only had it for 3 days n i don't like it at allBuild quality 10/10Reception 2/10Call quality 4/10Internet 3/10Multimedia 6/10Camera 2/10UI speed 2/10Everyday usage 3/10Text input 2/10Display 9/10Battery 4/10
- the color is good
- the structure is great durable
- bad service
- dont get ur text
- internet even sucks
- can't do much more than a basic phone
posted on 23 Apr 2011, 23:19
quickwrench has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
Right out of the box this phone was trouble prone. The first issue was the dialpad display would constantly flash on and off when I would attempt to tap in numbers on phone calls which required number entry such as the bank or to pay bills on an automated phone system. After a couple months the ringer and speaker system would shut itself off leaving Me with no way of hearing incoming phone calls. A very definate disapointment from motorola. Not to mention the processor speed is slow and lothargic.Build quality 2/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 4/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 4/10UI speed 2/10Everyday usage 2/10Text input 3/10Display 2/10Battery 6/10
- the phone was free with plan
- trouble prone
posted on 02 Apr 2011, 22:56 (Posts: 0; Member since: 02 Apr 2011)
ChExZ has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
When I got this phone I wasn't really expecting a whole lot, but I was expecting a little better than below average. The processing speed became a frequent problem. Also the phone for some strange reason would just shut of for absolutely no reason, this really frustrated me. I think Verizon could have done a little better job, but I understand it was just to throw something out on the market which I understand. This would be a good phone for someone that is looking to get a phone for their son or daughter that who would be happy with anything. This phone just wasn't the phone for me, sorry.... :-/Build quality 2/10Reception 3/10Call quality 5/10Internet 4/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 3/10UI speed 1/10Everyday usage 2/10Text input 4/10Display 3/10Battery 4/10
- Makes you really appreciate a better phone
- Mostly everything
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report