x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

HTC ChaCha HTC ChaCha


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 222 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Status HTC Status


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 222 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola FLIPOUT Motorola FLIPOUT


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola MOTOKEY XT Motorola MOTOKEY XT


  • Small dimensions (4.06 x 2.36 x 0.39 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Samsung GALAXY Pro Samsung GALAXY Pro


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy M Pro Samsung Galaxy M Pro


  • Single-core processor
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 217 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola CHARM Motorola CHARM


  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories