Motorola C115 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola C115 vs. Ericsson T39
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Nokia Lumia 900
Motorola C115
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 900
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Motorola C115
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Motorola C139
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Motorola C168
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Samsung E1195
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola C115 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Motorola C115
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
More Rivals
