x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola Brute i686 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Splash-proof phone
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Low-resolution video capture

Kyocera DuraXT Kyocera DuraXT


  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 1.12 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola i412 Motorola i412


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 0.79 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola i440 Motorola i440


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 0.98 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Sanyo Taho Sanyo Taho


  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 0.90 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola i576 Motorola i576


  • Water-resistant phone
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 1.00 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola Brute i686 Motorola Brute i686


  • Splash-proof phone
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Kyocera DuraCore Kyocera DuraCore


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (128 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches vs 0.90 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories