Motorola A925 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola A925 vs. Apple iPhone 4S
Motorola A925
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (208 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 4S
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola A925 vs. Samsung GALAXY Note II AT&T
Motorola A925
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (208 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung GALAXY Note II AT&T
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.5 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Supports special active stylus for input
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Motorola A925 vs. Apple iPhone 3G
Motorola A925
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (208 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
-
1.
What makes the Full HD IPS display on the LG Optimus G Pro better than AMOLED
-
2.
The forbidden fruit: here are 7 great Android apps that Google does not allow on Play store
-
3.
All from Google I/O 2013
-
4.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
