x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Motorola A45 ECO Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Motorola A45 ECO Motorola A45 ECO


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Motorola RAMBLER Motorola RAMBLER


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 128 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Motorola A45 ECO Motorola A45 ECO


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Motorola A45 ECO Motorola A45 ECO


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 800 Nokia Lumia 800


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 252 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Motorola A45 ECO Motorola A45 ECO


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Motorola FLIPOUT Motorola FLIPOUT


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Latest stories