Motorola A1680 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola A1260
Motorola A1260
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola A1200 Ming
Motorola A1680
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola A1200 Ming
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola GLEAM+
Motorola A1680
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Samsung E1195
Motorola A1680
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung E1195
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola AURA
Motorola A1680
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Motorola AURA
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola GLAM
Motorola A1680
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Motorola GLAM
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi vs 265 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz vs 550 MHz)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Motorola A1680 vs. Motorola Brute i686
Motorola A1680
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Motorola Brute i686
- Splash-proof phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.02 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
