x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Micromax X285 Micromax X285


  • Built-in flashlight

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Micromax X265 Micromax X265


  • Built-in flashlight

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 128 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches vs 4.72 x 2.08 x 0.40 inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches vs 4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 610 Nokia Lumia 610


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Micromax X288 Micromax X288


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories