Micromax X288 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X294
Micromax X288
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches vs 4.72 x 2.08 x 0.40 inches inches)
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X274
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X278
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X283
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X263
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. HTC DROID Incredible 4G LTE
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC DROID Incredible 4G LTE
- Dual core processor
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (275 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Micromax X288 vs. Micromax X276
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

