x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi)

Micromax X1i Reloaded Micromax X1i Reloaded


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Micromax X1i Xtra Micromax X1i Xtra


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Dual SIM card support
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Nokia 109 Nokia 109


  • No rear camera
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia X1-01 Nokia X1-01


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Micromax X101 Micromax X101


  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.81 x 0.52 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Micromax X259 Micromax X259


  • Dual SIM card support

Nokia 108 Nokia 108


  • Small dimensions (4.35 x 1.85 x 0.53 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (117 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories