Micromax X259 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Micromax X259 vs. Samsung GALAXY Tab 2 (7.0)
Micromax X259
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung GALAXY Tab 2 (7.0)
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 170 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Micromax A75
Micromax X259
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Micromax A75
- Slow processor (650 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Micromax X1i Xtra
Micromax X259
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Micromax X288
Micromax X288
- Small dimensions (4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Sony Xperia tipo dual
Micromax X259
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Sony Xperia tipo dual
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Samsung Galaxy S Duos
Micromax X259
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X259 vs. Micromax X278
Micromax X259
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
-
1.
What makes the Full HD IPS display on the LG Optimus G Pro better than AMOLED
-
2.
The forbidden fruit: here are 7 great Android apps that Google does not allow on Play store
-
3.
All from Google I/O 2013
-
4.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
