Micromax X231 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X294
Micromax X231
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches vs 4.72 x 2.08 x 0.40 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X235
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches vs 4.39 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X263
Micromax X231
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X283
Micromax X231
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X288
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches vs 4.48 x 0.95 x 0.62 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X278
Micromax X231
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Micromax X231 vs. Micromax X285
Micromax X231
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 1.98 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
