MiTAC Mio 8390 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
MiTAC Mio 8390 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
MiTAC Mio 8390
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
MiTAC Mio 8390 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
MiTAC Mio 8390
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
MiTAC Mio 8390 vs. Sony Xperia J
MiTAC Mio 8390
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
MiTAC Mio 8390 vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia ray
MiTAC Mio 8390
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Ericsson Xperia ray
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8.1 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.09 x 0.37 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
MiTAC Mio 8390 vs. Sony Xperia U
MiTAC Mio 8390
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Xperia U
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (280 ppi)
- Dual core processor
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

