LG enV Touch Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG enV Touch vs. Samsung Brightside
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Brightside
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (129 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. LG Dare
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. Samsung Rogue
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 301 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. LG Extravert
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
LG Extravert
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. LG enV3
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. Samsung Reality
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Reality
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
LG enV Touch vs. LG Chocolate Touch VX8575
LG enV Touch
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
